Gross yearly savings
—
Hours saved × hourly cost, over 47 working weeks.
Enter hours, people and costs: the tool estimates yearly savings, ROI and payback time with transparent assumptions. No data is sent to the server.
How long it takes one person to complete the process today.
How many people run the process on average.
Average company cost per hour, not net salary.
How much of the manual work disappears. 60–80% is a prudent range.
—
Hours saved × hourly cost, over 47 working weeks.
—
—
(savings − first-year costs) ÷ first-year costs.
—
Months needed for savings to cover the one-off cost.
Four inputs, two readings of the result.
How many hours the process absorbs today, how many times a week it runs and how many people it involves.
The average fully-loaded cost per hour of the people involved, not the net salary.
One-off cost (tools, integration) and yearly recurring cost (licenses, maintenance).
Gross yearly savings, 12-month ROI and payback in months, with the saved time also read as capacity.
The estimate helps when the assumptions are explicit and verified.
Activities that repeat every week with fairly stable rules: savings really compound.
Value grows with the number of people touching the process, not just with speed.
Compare payback with the real cost of alternatives: the tool separates setup cost from yearly cost.
Positive ROI is not enough: if the process is unclear (owner, exceptions, data) automation still fails. Assess readiness first with the Process Readiness Tool.
Compare the value of saved time (hours saved × hourly cost) with the cost of automation (tools, integration, maintenance). This tool estimates yearly savings and payback time from your own assumptions.
It depends on complexity: a simple automation with no-code tools costs a few hundred euros per year; a process with integrations and decision logic costs more. The tool separates one-off cost from yearly cost.
Repetitive, high-volume, cross-team processes: data collection, reporting, approvals, reconciliations, follow-ups. ROI grows when the process involves more people and runs several times a week.
Yes, if the freed time is reinvested in higher-value work or reduces hiring needs. If the saved time is not used, the benefit is capacity, not cash: the tool shows both readings for this reason.
Go deeper: AI process mapping →
Want the 6 complete review templates? See the Project Review Kit →
ROI is measured over time: ControlRoom keeps project progress, costs and risks together, including automation initiatives.